Chinese version: Protecting Nature by Reforming Environmentally Harmful Subsidies: An Update

This is the Chinese version of our updated analysis of global environmentally harmful subsidies (EHS). (The English language version of this report, and associated commentary can be accessed here.)

Since our original analysis in 2022, the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) was adopted in December 2022 to protect and restore nature. The GBF included Target 18, the first quantitative EHS reduction goal, which commits parties to reduce EHS by $500 billion annually by 2030.  The Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ) Agreement, or the “High Seas Treaty”, was passed in 2023 and now has 92 signatories (though far fewer ratifications). It is the first international legally binding instrument to conserve and sustainably manage marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction, an area that encompasses roughly two-thirds of the world’s oceans.

These agreements are a big success, and finally subject EHS to policy review and potential discipline. The update reviews these agreements, evaluates progress on an array of other international agreements to curb subsidies to sectors of concern, assesses early efforts to track and quantify EHS policies, and updates our estimate on the scale of global EHS.

Both this update and our original review of EHS incorporated multiple sectors affecting resource extraction and land-use change because it is the combined effect that is driving loss of nature and biodiversity resources. International analysis of subsidies is too often focused on a single sector. We continue to use a multi-sector approach here, and have expanded it where possible.

The update report estimates current environmentally harmful subsidies to be at least $2.6 trillion, equivalent to 2.5% of global GDP. This is about $800 billion higher than two years ago, or roughly $570 billion higher net of inflation. A combination of improved data -- including the inclusion of estimates for non-energy mining and plastics production for the first time, inflation, and rising subsidies particularly to fossil fuels was behind the increase. Major data gaps in the water and forestry sectors remain, despite much effort to identify new research.

Achieving the GBF targets for EHS reporting by 2025 and reforms of at least $500 billion/year by 2030 will be challenging. Targets 18.1 (environmentally-positive subsidies) and 18.2 (reductions in EHS) provide the main frameworks to measure progress. However, methodologies are still evolving, vary by region, and suffer significant data capture challenges. The analysis suggests approaches to speed development of reporting frameworks and ensure there aren't significant blind spots in the information on EHS that is captured. China will need to be part of this process, and this translation helps to engage readers and researchers within the country.

We are again grateful to Business for Nature and Greenhouse Communications for their help in amplifying the key messages, Spiral Communications for their graphic design of the report, and the Society of Entrepreneurs and Ecology (SEE) and Shell Lin for the Chinese translation.